Corona-crisis: The shadow side of the social distancing – Naturopathy naturopathy specialist portal
Corona crisis is to contact a crisis
In the face of threats such as the Corona pandemic, people stick together more. The measures of social distancing, however, contradict this impulse. We don’t want to be closer together – but may not! A German research team on the Dilemma of the Social Distancing attention.
Researchers point to the end of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, led by Professor Ophelia Deroy of the fact that the contradiction between the need for Closeness and social distancing is a bigger threat to society could be as overt antisocial behavior. The report was recently published in the renowned journal “Current Biology”.
The management of the opposition is the biggest challenge
The Team of Professor of philosophy Deroy suggests that the corona could represent a crisis for the global society, the greatest challenge since the second world war. This is not meant alone the actual threat posed by the Virus. The lack of counter-measures, we rely on the so-called “social distancing,” i.e., contact constraints between people.
The researchers point to the fact that global or national threats, usually by the people of a social power. The measures for social distancing torpedo, however, this impulse. “This deal is currently the biggest challenge for us,” explains Deroy.
Selfishness is the core of the problem
Pictures of empty supermarkets, as well as quarrels to toilet paper and flour, to convey an image of selfish reactions to the crisis. In addition, a group of people to come to the fore, the refuse, the risks and the measures to recognize. Overall, a picture of a antisocial and selfish society so often.
Philosophy expert Deroy, Social neurobiologist Chris Frith and of the social psychologist Guillaume Dezecache keep this Image of society is not representative. Instead, people are more likely to be in acute danger and to search more actively for close social contacts.
Threats make us social
The Team supports the argument with studies in the field of neuroscience, psychology and evolutionary biology. This demonstrated that we are so selfish, as many people believe. The researchers suggest there is plenty of evidence that we are in threatening situations, more cooperative and social, than we are usually.
Social distancing is contrary to the natural danger instinct
“People are afraid, they seek contact to other, but in this case increases the risk of infection for all of us,” explains Dezecache. This contradiction is an evolutionary mismatch. To keep the call to isolate themselves in case of danger and the distance was contrary to the natural instincts.
The social Paradox
According to the arguments of the team, the anti-social reactions of people to the threat from this Problem, but the social. “Social contact no ,Plus’ we can do without are: you are a state of normality”, underlines Deroy. The natural need to be close to mountains now, the risk of aggravation of the hazards.
How could we break out of this Dilemma?
Deroy and her colleagues are of the opinion that it is social media, which are seen in normal times, rather than antisocial, can provide in times of crisis, an acceptable and effective Alternative to physical proximity. People should increasingly communicate virtually with friends, neighbors, Relatives, or other conversation partners.
“Our original inclinations to be cooperative, not selfish,” says Frith. These needs could be partly met via the Internet live. “How well and how long the social needs can be satisfied remains to be seen,” adds Deroy. In the case of decisions in the policy must be taken into account more in the future, the call for social distancing is the equivalent of the human beings cognitive, and evolutionary.
Free Internet for all
The Munich philosopher holds a free access to the Internet for all people is an important contribution to freedom of expression and, in this context, even for an important contribution to public health. “This is the message that is important, especially since the most Vulnerable due to poverty, age and illness often have less social contacts,” says Deroy.